11/9/2023 0 Comments Lion king zazu flying clipart"Then there’s the small matter of a certain Disney prequel. “I think the reason this one works is because it’s based on this strong original movie.” After all, there’s nothing like the real thing.A Reddit post purports to show leaked information that director Barry Jenkins has some concrete plans for the upcoming followup to the 2019 CGI TLK remake: Furniss agreed: “I don’t think so,” she said, when asked if she anticipates a potential boom in photo-realistic remakes. The film’s use of hyperrealism is “a natural extension of what’s been going on anyway,” he said.ĭr. Does this mean that the movie might spark a new trend, generating a wave of copycat photo-realistic films? Not quite, Klein said. After the wild success of both Aladdin and Beauty and the Beast, it would come as no surprise if it crossed the $1 billion mark. “Disney people are unquestionably ingenious at double- and triple-marketing things.”Įvidently the photo-realism naysayers aren’t having an effect on that bottom line: The Lion King reboot is currently tracking at $450 million worldwide in its opening weekend. “If there’s a nickel under your refrigerator, they will find it,” he quipped. Like many other critics he also sees this new Lion King as not necessarily a creatively driven enterprise, but a means to usher a new generation into the studio’s rich archive-and to make money. Though he had not yet seen the film when we spoke, based on the concept and the trailers alone, he anticipated that it would be “a fairly stale experience” compared to the original Lion King. “The problem is, how do you make a handcrafted National Geographic character?” said urban and media historian Norman Klein, a professor at CalArts, in a separate interview. It’s extraordinary work in and of itself, the new film’s ability to render a near-perfect imitation of something from the real world. Film critic Roger Ebert called the movie Bambi for a new generation, praising its animators for embracing the studio’s classic, hand-drawn ethos while also using new technology to create “several remarkable sequences, including a stampede in which a herd seems to flow past the camera.” Maureen Furniss, an animation historian and director at CalArts, in a recent phone interview-not least because of its stunning hand-drawn animation, which brought to life vast, lush landscapes populated by a multitude of expressive animals. “It changed the dynamic of everything that was going on at the studio,” said Dr. Then it broke 200, and the parties just wouldn’t stop.” Suddenly the true box office potential of animated films had been unleashed. “I remember we had parties for when it broke $100 million,” animator Andreas Deja says in the 2005 documentary Dream on Silly Dreamer, an unvarnished look at the rise and fall of Disney animation. Released in 1994, the Shakespearean family epic became an absolute blockbuster, smashing expectations and bringing the studio to new heights it was the second-highest-grossing film in North America that year, and would soon become one of the highest-grossing films of all time domestically. After that came Beauty and the Beast and Aladdin, two more critical and commercial hits that cemented Disney’s cinematic renaissance.īut none of those movies were as big as The Lion King. The studio was then just a few years removed from a prolonged artistic and box office slump, one that reversed only in 1989 with the release of The Little Mermaid. Disney was not Disney as we know it in 1994.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |